March 2010
Empty property relief rates 2010/2011
For the year 2010/11, empty commercial properties with rateable values of up to £18,000 will be exempt from business rates.
MoreFranbar Holdings Limited –v- Patel and Others
27th August 2008
Directors’ duties are owed to the Company and only the Company is able to enforce them, although in certain circumstances shareholders may be able to bring a Derivative Action to enforce a course of action vested in the Company on the Company’s behalf.
The Companies Act 2006 introduced a new Derivative Procedure to replace the common law action in respect of claims on or after the 1 October 2007.
However an action may only be brought in respect of an act or proposed act or omission involving negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust by a Director of the Company as well as in respect of an alleged breach of the general duties of Directors including the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence. There is no requirement for a Director to have benefited personally from the breach, as was previously the case.
However the court must refuse permission for a claimant to bring a derivative claim where it is satisfied that either:
A person acting in accordance with the general duty to promote the success of the Company would not seek to continue the claim.
In this recent High Court case M Limited was wholly owned by F Limited. At the end of July 2005 F Limited sold 75% of the shares in M Limited to C Limited. At the same time F Limited and C Limited entered into a shareholders’ agreement which, among other matters, granted F Limited an option to sell the remaining shares in M Limited to C Limited and granted C Limited to call for those shares, in each case at the price of 9 times M Limited’s adjusted earnings.
Disputes arose between the parties. F Limited issued proceedings and the complaints related to the diversion of business opportunities from M Limited to C Limited, a suspension of an appointed person as a Director of F Limited and a failure to provide adequate financial information including the audited Management Accounts. F Limited made a number of applications to the court, one of which was an application for permission to continue a derivative claim by the members.
The High Court refused the application under Section 261 of the Companies Act for permission to continue with a derivative claim.
Whilst there was substance in the complaints which had been made by F Limited and that some of those complaints would, if established, give rise to breaches of duty which were incapable of ratification. There was work still to be done in formulating a clear claim for breaches which had caused actionable loss to M Limited, and it would be open to a hypothetical Director to decline to proceed with the derivative claim at this stage. While he might attach importance to its continuation in the future, it was not possible to be satisfied that he would do so now. Considerable weight was given to the fact that F Limited should be able to achieve all that it could properly want through a petition under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 and a shareholders action rather than a derivative action.
This is one of the first reported decisions in which the statutory derivative action provisions have been considered. The court has made it clear that derivative actions cannot be a panacea. Perspective litigants must therefore consider other options first.
Click here to speak to a specialist commercial lawyer
Notes to Editors
Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law is a commercial law practice providing a range of legal services to business and commercial clients in Oldham and across the North West. The firm's specialities include Company & Commercial, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Commercial Property matters.
As one of the leading law firms in the North of England, Pearson Hinchliffe’s mission is to be ‘the complete law firm’ providing the highest quality legal services to its clients. It does this by offering practical and cost effective, high quality legal advice for a wide range of clients. Each client is catered for as an individual with their business and personal requirements taken into account which allows for a highly personalised service.
For more information on this article or Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law, please contact a member of the marketing communications team on +44 (0)161 785 3500 or email muhammed.shaikh@pearson-hinchliffe.co.uk
February 2010
A third of SME bosses are unaware of their employment law obligations, says BIS.
A Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) study uncovers employers’ poor knowledge and management of responsibilities.
MoreFebruary 2010
New Guidance on Fit Notes published today
Guidance on plans to replace sick notes with fit notes is now available to employers from the Department for Work and Pensions.
MoreFebruary 2010
CIPD predicts public sector recession
The UK economy is facing more redundancies, with substantial cuts expected in the public sector, report says.
MoreFebruary 2010
Pre-Budget Report checklist
This checklist highlights some of the key issues from the Pre-Budget Report that are likely to have an impact on small businesses.
MoreFebruary 2010
Oldham Construction Sector
On 3 February 2010 Corporate Commercial partner Roger Hinchliffe delivered a presentation entitled, ‘Joint Ventures’ to the Oldham Construction Sector group.
January 2010
Debt Recovery Service
With our specialist commercial Debt Recovery service you can significantly increase the speed and likelihood of recovering the money owed to your business.
January 2010
PH Employment Direct
The Employment team at Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law have created PH Employment Direct - a user-friendly and simple service that gives you access to the best advice at the end of a phone 24hrs a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
October 2009
M&A Opportunities
A live selection of current assignments offered by Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law or those of our professional partner organisation,
August 2008
Franbar Holdings Limited –v- Patel and Others
Concerning the Derivative Actions introduced by the Companies Act 2006.
July 2008
Systime Inc.
Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law's specialist Company & Commercial team has advised multi-national Systime Inc. on an important contractual document implemented Europe-wide.
June 2008
Dashfield v Davidson, do your company’s articles reflect your intentions?
When a shareholder died unexpectedly, under the articles the company then purchased the shares based on accounts for the last completed financial year prior to the death - 2 years prior.