Victimisation in the workplace
The Underworld garment factory in TV soap Coronation Street has never been known as the home of harmonious industrial relations.
When a cantankerous machinist threatened to take the then-boss Mike Baldwin to an employment tribunal for insisting that she work overtime to get out a last-minute order, he told her menacingly: “I have a terrible memory – I never forget a thing.”
This piece of bravado could easily have landed the roguish Mike on the wrong side of legislation that protects employees against victimisation by their boss.
Under these rules, employers are forbidden to treat an employee who brings or takes action over a discrimination, harassment or equal-pay claim less favourably than his or her colleagues.
The rules are intended to make sure that employees are not deterred from bringing a claim, or helping others to do so, for fear of reprisals. They apply to the various discrimination laws on sex, race, disability, religion or belief, sexual orientation and age.
Employees can claim to have been victimised if they are treated less favourably than their colleagues for:
- bringing proceedings against the boss;
- giving evidence or information to do with proceedings someone else has brought against the boss; or
- alleging that the boss, or anyone else, has broken discrimination laws.
Bosses are also guilty of victimisation for handing out less favourable treatment to anyone they suspect of merely intending to do any of these things.
The law does not, however, apply to treatment of employees “by reason of any allegation that was false and not made in good faith”.
A person can still claim victimisation even after moving to work for someone else. This would happen, for example, if a former employer refused to give a reference to an ex-employee who had previously brought a case against the firm.
Now can you imagine what Mike Baldwin would have made of that?
To speak to a specialist in this area of law please contact us
Notes to Editors As one of the leading law firms in the North of England, Pearson Hinchliffe’s mission is to be ‘the complete law firm’ providing the highest quality legal services to its clients. It does this by offering practical and cost effective, high quality legal advice for a wide range of clients. Each client is catered for as an individual with their business and personal requirements taken into account which allows for a highly personalised service. For more information on this article or Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law, please contact a member of the marketing communications team on +44 (0)161 785 3500 or email
Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law is a commercial law practice providing a range of legal service to business and commercial clients in Oldham and across the North West. The firm's specialities include Company & Commercial, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Commercial Property matters.
employment advice oldham, employment law oldham, legal employee advice, legal job advice, employment lawyer oldham, oldham employment solicitor. carreers advice oldham, redundancy advice oldham, taking redundancy oldham, constructive dismissal advice oldham rochdale manchester, employment law oldham rochdale manchester, wrongful dismissal, employment claim, employment advice,
News
18th November 2008
Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v PRG Powerhouse - implications for the commercial property market
CVA "unfairly prejudiced" landlords having the benefit of creditor arrangements and third party guarantees.
13th November 2008
Acas code of practice on discipline and grievance, approved by BERR
Cost and time-saving reforms, aimed at solving diputes internally, scheduled for April 2009.
11th November 2008
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954: Ending and renewing business tenancies
What to consider to protect both parties' interests.
Case Study
27th August 2008
Franbar Holdings Limited –v- Patel and Others
Concerning the Derivative Actions introduced by the Companies Act 2006.
21st July 2008
Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law Advises Systime Inc. on Europe-wide supplier contract
Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law's specialist Company & Commercial team has advised multi-national Systime Inc. on an important contractual document implemented Europe-wide.
2nd June 2008
Dashfield v Davidson, do your company’s articles reflect your intentions?
When a shareholder died unexpectedly, under the articles the company then purchased the shares based on accounts for the last completed financial year prior to the death - 2 years prior.