Skip navigation
investors in people logo lexel accreditation logo
newsletter thumbnail

Subscribe to and view our newsletter


 

Corporate Manslaughter Act and the events industry

21st April 2008

Britain’s burgeoning events industry is now estimated to be worth around £10 billion a year, as companies come up with more and more extreme ideas to foster corporate bonding.

Less adventurous staff, of course, always struggled to see the link between team-building and taking part in the latest white-knuckle experience. Their hopes were raised when initial commentaries on the new Corporate Manslaughter Act seemed to indicate that companies would be forced to drop potentially dangerous activities.

The Act, which comes into force on April 6, sets out a new offence for convicting an organisation where a “gross failure” in the way activities are managed or organised results in someone’s death. In other words, it seeks to strengthen the sanctions on negligent employers who, by ignoring good safety practice and necessary regulation, kill their staff and members of the public.

A substantial part of the failure in the organisation must be at senior level – among those who make significant decisions about the organisation or substantial parts of it – for a prosecution to be successful. And an organisation guilty of the offence will be liable to an unlimited fine.

While the Act is an opportunity for employers to think again about how risks are managed, the new offence does not require organisations to comply with new regulatory standards. Employers already owe its duties in the civil law of negligence and the new offence is based on these.

As Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents chief executive Tom Mullarkey has put it: “The Act is not designed to undermine a spirit of enterprise, nor to inhibit a creative, fun atmosphere which can be so valuable in welding work colleagues into a team.”

It looks as though employees who prefer flower-arranging to fire-eating or quilting to quad-bike racing may be skulking on the sidelines at team-building events for a little while longer. 
 
To speak to a specialist in this area of law please contact us

Notes to Editors


Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law is a commercial law practice providing a range of legal service to business and commercial clients in Oldham and across the North West. The firm's specialities include Company & Commercial, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Commercial Property matters.

As one of the leading law firms in the North of England, Pearson Hinchliffe’s mission is to be ‘the complete law firm’ providing the highest quality legal services to its clients. It does this by offering practical and cost effective, high quality legal advice for a wide range of clients.  Each client is catered for as an individual with their business and personal requirements taken into account which allows for a highly personalised service.

For more information on this article or Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law, please contact a member of the marketing communications team on +44 (0)161 785 3500 or email

 

 

News

18th November 2008

Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v PRG Powerhouse - implications for the commercial property market

CVA "unfairly prejudiced" landlords having the benefit of creditor arrangements and third party guarantees.


13th November 2008

Acas code of practice on discipline and grievance, approved by BERR

Cost and time-saving reforms, aimed at solving diputes internally, scheduled for April 2009.


11th November 2008

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954: Ending and renewing business tenancies

What to consider to protect both parties' interests.


Case Study

27th August 2008

Franbar Holdings Limited –v- Patel and Others

Concerning the Derivative Actions introduced by the Companies Act 2006.


21st July 2008

Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law Advises Systime Inc. on Europe-wide supplier contract

Pearson Hinchliffe Commercial Law's specialist Company & Commercial team has advised multi-national Systime Inc. on an important contractual document implemented Europe-wide.


2nd June 2008

Dashfield v Davidson, do your company’s articles reflect your intentions?

When a shareholder died unexpectedly, under the articles the company then purchased the shares based on accounts for the last completed financial year prior to the death - 2 years prior.